The Substantive Meaning of the Crime of Illegal Medical Practice with "Serious Circumstance"
-
摘要: “国家医疗管理秩序”不是非法行医罪的保护法益, 破坏医疗管理秩序不能作为本罪实质的处罚根据。现有单一法益说与双重法益说均有缺陷, 非法行医罪的保护法益应是公共卫生安全。非法行医罪是具体危险犯, 处罚根据是行为足以给公众的生命安全和身体健康造成实害的具体危险。对罪状中的“情节严重”应采取实质解释, 确定医疗行为是否达到足以侵害不特定或者多数人生命安全和身体健康的危险程度。对于受过2次行政处罚后又实施非法行医行为的处罚, 应从保护公共卫生安全这一目的出发, 从违法程度、违法主体、违法间隔时间等方面进行限制, 并坚持禁止重复评价原则。Abstract: The "national medical management order" is not a legal benefit protection for the crime of illegal medical practice. Disrupting the medical management order cannot be used as the substantive punishment basis for this crime. The existing single legal interest theory and dual legal interest theory have defects. The protection of legal interest in the crime of illegal medical practice should be public health safety. The crime of illegal medical practice is a specific dangerous crime, and the punishment is based on the specific danger that the behavior is enough to cause harm to the public's life safety and physical health. A substantive explanation should be adopted for the "serious circumstance" in the criminal case to determine whether the medical behavior has reached a level of danger that is enough to harm the safety and physical health of unspecified or majority individuals. For the punishment of illegal medical practice after receiving twice administrative penalties, for the purpose of protecting public health safety, restrictions should be imposed on the degree of illegality, the subject of illegality, and the interval between illegalities, and the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluations should be adhered to.
-
[1] 广西壮族自治区钦州市中级人民法院(2020)桂07刑终209号刑事判决书[Z]. [2] 江苏省滨海县人民法院(2020)苏0922刑初509号刑事判决书[Z]. [3] 陕西省西乡县人民法院(2020)陕0724刑初119号刑事判决书[Z]. [4] 上海市松江区人民法院(2020)沪0117刑初1704号刑事判决书[Z]. [5] 陈洪兵. 公共危险犯解释论与判例研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2011: 298. [6] 陈璇. 法益概念与刑事立法正当性检验[J]. 比较法研究, 2020, 169(3): 51-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJFY202003004.htm [7] 関哲夫, 王充. 法益概念与多元的保护法益论[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2006(3): 67-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLDB200603010.htm [8] 张道许. 非法行医案件中行政执法与刑事司法的衔接——兼评最高人民法院有关司法解释[J]. 行政法学研究, 2010(2): 89-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZFX201002015.htm [9] 张明楷. 刑法学: 上[M]. 6版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 160. [10] 劳东燕. 法条主义与刑法解释中的实质判断[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2017, 20(6): 16-34. [11] 刘彩灵. 非法行医罪认定中的问题与解决路径[J]. 人民论坛, 2016(17): 145-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RMLT201617049.htm [12] 张明楷. 简评近年来的刑事司法解释[J]. 清华法学, 2014, 8(1): 5-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHFX201401001.htm [13] 段阳伟. "受过行政处罚入罪"规定之证成[J]. 河北法学, 2021, 39(1): 88-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBFX202101006.htm [14] 刘德法, 孔德琴. 论多次犯[J]. 法治研究, 2011, 57(9): 83-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYT201109016.htm [15] 邵栋豪. 法律拟制及其刑法视域的中国检讨[J]. 刑法论丛, 2009, 17(1): 126-151. [16] 郭旨龙, 肖雅菁. "行政处罚后又实施"入罪的限缩性司法适用[J]. 江西社会科学, 2020, 40(8): 164-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXSH202008019.htm [17] 陈洪兵. "情节严重"司法解释的纰缪及规范性重构[J]. 东方法学, 2019, 70(4): 87-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DFFX201904008.htm [18] 胡剑锋. "行政处罚后又实施"入罪的反思及限缩[J]. 政治与法律, 2014(8): 42-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHEN201408005.htm [19] 江苏省东海县人民法院(2020)苏0722刑初640号刑事判决书[Z]. [20] 陕西省西乡县人民法院(2020)陕0724刑初119号刑事判决书[Z]. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 170
- HTML全文浏览量: 97
- PDF下载量: 18
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
